01001 10110 00101 11010 01100 10101 00011 11001 01010 10110 00101 11010 01100 10101
Facebook

SGX IPO flipping results from three recent listings

For a few years now, I have been documenting my personal experiments with Singapore Exchange initial public offerings. The tracking started as a way to see whether the hype around retail IPO flipping was real or just noise. After watching the SGX welcome several interesting listings recently, I decided to commit real money to three separate offers and record everything honestly, including the underperformers.

The idea behind IPO flipping is simple in theory. You subscribe during the offering period, receive an allotment if demand allows, and sell on the first trading day or within the first week. The appeal is obvious: a quick realised gain without the long waiting periods associated with value investing. The reality, as my recent logs show, is far less consistent, and the past three attempts have produced a very mixed set of outcomes.

What follows are the actual figures from my three latest SGX IPO attempts. I am writing this from Sydney, where I keep most of my investment records in a shared spreadsheet that also tracks my Singapore Savings Bond holdings and monthly household spending. The numbers include brokerage fees, currency conversion spreads, and the Australian dollar equivalent of every trade, so anyone reading along can see the real return rather than a paper gain that evaporates once conversion is taken into account.

A quick note before the details: this is not advice. I am a retail investor in Australia who also invests in Singapore, and the tax treatment of any foreign capital gain depends on your own situation. The ATO treats gains on the SGX much like gains on any other listed equity, and I will touch on that at the end of this post with a practical checklist for fellow Australians.

My screening process before allotment day

I do not subscribe to every SGX IPO that crosses my radar. The screen is fairly basic, built around the prospectus summary, the indicative price-to-earnings ratio, and whether the sponsor is someone whose track record I trust. I also look at the offer size, because very small placements can be illiquid on debut and harder to flip into strength. Large placements tend to have more institutional support on day one, which usually means tighter spreads when I want to exit.

Three questions usually decide whether I apply:

For the three IPOs discussed here, I passed on two other offers during the same window. One was a China-concept stock trading at a high multiple with limited Singapore institutional support. The other was a secondary listing that priced at the top of the range with no allocation advantage for retail subscribers. Passing is part of the discipline, and ignoring the temptation to apply for every hot deal is half the battle.

Because I split my attention between ASX small caps and SGX names, the screening also has to fit within a limited amount of time each week. Weekends are usually for reading, weeknights for monitoring. Anyone in Melbourne with a long commute can relate to the challenge of keeping up with two markets at once, especially when one of them opens while the other is still in pre-market trading.

Listing one: a consumer brand that worked

The first IPO was a Singapore-based food and beverage company that priced at the bottom of its range. My application was for a modest number of shares, and I received a partial allotment. The stock opened above the issue price on debut, giving me a paper gain within minutes of the opening bell, which is always a pleasant way to start the morning.

I sold roughly half of my holding on day one and the rest on day two, after noticing that intraday volume was starting to thin out. Net of brokerage and the spread between bid and ask, the realised gain translated to a healthy single-digit percentage return. When converted back to Australian dollars, the gain was slightly higher because the Singapore dollar had strengthened marginally against the AUD during the holding period.

This was the cleanest result of the three and matched the hype around IPO flipping that you often see on social media. It also reinforced my preference for issuers that price conservatively and have a recognisable consumer brand behind them, since those tend to attract both retail and institutional buyers on debut.

Listing two: a healthcare play that stagnated

The second offering was in the healthcare space, specifically a distributor with regional exposure across Southeast Asia. The valuation looked reasonable on paper, and there was some retail enthusiasm because the company had been covered in local business press for weeks leading up to the prospectus. I applied for more shares than I did in the first listing and received a fuller allotment, which at the time felt like a good problem to have.

Listing day was flat. The stock opened roughly at the issue price, drifted lower in the first hour, and then stabilised around the issue level for the rest of the session. I held through the first week, expecting a bounce that never came, and by the end of week two I was sitting on a small loss and decided to cut the position rather than wait further.

This experience was a reminder that grey market premiums, when they exist, can disappear quickly once trading begins. It also showed me that a good business and a fair valuation do not automatically translate into short-term trading gains. Patience matters, but so does recognising when a trade thesis has failed and moving on to the next opportunity. For more on how I think about pairing short-term trades with longer-term holdings, I keep notes in my using Singapore Savings Bonds as an emergency fund alternative review, where I describe how liquid reserves support this type of opportunistic buying.

Listing three: a technology listing that gapped down

The third IPO was the most disappointing. It was a small-cap technology company with a niche regional focus, and the prospectus highlighted several major customers as proof of revenue stability. I applied with moderate enthusiasm but received only a tiny allotment because retail demand was overwhelming, with subscription multiples reportedly above twenty times the retail tranche.

On listing day, the stock opened below the issue price and continued to slide throughout the first session. I sold at a loss within the first hour, simply to limit the damage and avoid watching a small position become a psychological burden. The percentage loss was the largest of the three trades, even though the absolute dollar figure was small because my allotment was small. This is the classic scenario where the allocation is too small to matter in dollar terms but large enough in percentage terms to sting.

This was the scenario that retail IPO flippers fear most. The lesson for me was to be more cautious with hot demand and small floats, because the combination often leads to allocations that are too small to matter, followed by a quick gap down that wipes out the marginal gain that might have existed. It also reinforced the value of having a written exit plan before the listing day, rather than improvising in the first few minutes of trading.

Common pitfalls I now watch for:

Practical takeaways for Australian investors

Across the three SGX IPOs, my blended result was a modest net gain after brokerage and currency conversion. One trade did well, one did nothing, and one lost money. That distribution is actually typical of retail IPO flipping, even when the screen looks reasonable, and it is why position sizing matters so much in this corner of the market.

Because I am an Australian tax resident, every SGX trade has to be converted back to AUD using the exchange rate on the date of each transaction. The ATO does not accept an annual average; it wants the actual rate at acquisition and disposal for each parcel of shares. I keep a small spreadsheet that records the buy rate, sell rate, and the resulting capital gain or loss in Singapore dollars, then mirrors the calculation in Australian dollars so my tax software accepts the figures without manual adjustment.

For Australian investors considering SGX IPO flipping, a short checklist helps:

I will continue to apply selectively, but I will also keep the positions small enough that a bad allocation does not derail my broader plan. The Singapore Savings Bond ladder continues to do the heavy lifting in my portfolio, and I have written about my rolling over Singapore Savings Bonds approach for anyone who wants a steadier alternative to short-term trading. If you have been watching the SGX IPO calendar and wondering whether the flipping game still works, the honest answer is that it sometimes does. Track every trade in a single spreadsheet, keep the position size sensible, and make sure your Australian dollar records are airtight before the end of the financial year on 30 June.